Comments on: Well, This Should Be No Surprise…

By: Abbey

Abbey — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 02:37:08 +0000

So i shouldn’t be surpised, but I took the Husband test, as myself now, and got:
78

As a 1930s husband, I am
Very Superior

Better then my -34 as a wife

By: melissa

melissa — Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:10:21 +0000

I got a 16…..much higher than I thought, given I’m a very independent wife! Some of thoses, gave me a good laugh. ‘Have dinner ready for him when he gets home….’ ha ha!

By: Daniel G. Clark

Daniel G. Clark — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:55:42 +0000

Hmmm… Now I took the men’s test again, as intended. To my surprise, this says I would have been a Very Superior 1930s (132) husband–as I claimed I actually am. That doesn’t feel so accurate, either. Oh, well…

Dad

By: Daniel G. Clark

Daniel G. Clark — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:44:44 +0000

Becca,

I filled out both versions, trying to give the “correct” answers rather than how I myself would perform in the role. Evidently I understand what was stereotyped about wives much better than husbands, because I scored 91 on wives and 31 on husbands. Frankly, I don’t believe 31 gives me enough credit for what I know about 1930s American men. I’m guessing I bet on the wrong mix of fact and fiction–too much fantasy about women and too much harsh reality about men.

Dad

By: Abbey Strum

Abbey Strum — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:23:15 +0000

I’ve kicked your rear!!! I got -34!!! Very Pour (Failure)

And THAT is no surprise!

By: Kate

Kate — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:55:33 +0000

I think that you are an amazing wife!!! We shall form a club of craptacular 30’s wives who are AWESOME in the year 2008!

By: Josh

Josh — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 02:02:26 +0000

As a 1930s husband, I am
Very Superior

Here are my results as a husband. much Better than expected. I really think my wifes are low, because she is a great wife.